23.05.2024

Double materiality analysis: bridging the gap between theory and practice

Now that the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) is in force, creating new sustainability reporting obligations, companies are faced with big challenges.

In particular, the double materiality analysis, the centerpiece of the new EU directive and also the starting point for reporting, requires affected companies to look closely at their own business processes, their impacts on people and the environment, and the resulting financial opportunities and risks. 

The CSRD is setting new standards here by establishing detailed requirements for the materiality analysis that go well beyond the previous reporting obligations (CSR-RUG). For companies, it is crucial to plan and provide the necessary time and staffing resources to implement the legal stipulations. But for that to occur, the requirements need to be understood first. 

Definition of double materiality under the CSRD:

Sustainability aspects are considered to be material if they either have material impacts on the environment and society as a result of a company’s business activities and value chain (inside-out perspective) or if the sustainability aspects themselves are associated with material financial ramifications for the company (outside-in perspective). 

Uncertainties despite extensive specifications and information

The theoretical bases for double materiality analysis have been drafted in extensive detail – they were defined in the European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS) in the summer of 2023 (see ESRS 1 and ESRS 2). Afterward, a guideline over 40 pages long on the implementation of the double materiality analysis was published in late 2023 by the European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (EFRAG), followed by further explanatory information from academia and NGOs, such as the CSRD Quick Guide published by TU Wien in cooperation with WWF.

A closer look at the publicly accessible information surrounding the topic of double materiality reveals differences in how the various stakeholders are interpreting the standards. For example, different users of the standards take different views on the time when, and the manner in which, internal and external stakeholders are to be involved. 

There is thus no standardized or one-size-fits-all solution for a double materiality analysis. This has created a great deal of uncertainty, especially among companies that are carrying out a materiality analysis for the first time. Still, the lack of uniform approaches is not necessarily a negative. Instead, it means companies are called on to interpret the standards for performing this analysis individually for themselves. This process may involve more time, effort, and expense, but it also provides an opportunity for organizations to craft an analysis that best meets their needs.

Corporate sustainability in the SME sector

A Haufe study on corporate sustainability among medium-sized companies showed that companies that are still at the very beginning of their CSRD journey in particular (some 35% of respondents) have a hard time navigating the wealth of information available.

Value added by a double materiality analysis

A double materiality analysis is a crucial tool for developing transparent and targeted sustainability reporting. It allows companies to delimit the scope of their reporting on the ten environmental, social, and governance (ESG) standards identified by the ESRS in a way that makes sense for them. But beyond the preparation of the report itself, this kind of analysis also contributes to holistic risk management: Double materiality analysis requires a critical evaluation of a company’s own business model and the value chain. Companies should utilize it to identify material risks associated with sustainability topics (such as risks arising from climate change or species extinction and the associated pollinator loss) and take timely countermeasures to avert or reduce those risks. This potential also translates to financial opportunities, which – if recognized in time – can bring companies a competitive advantage. 

By reflecting on and identifying connections between their own impacts on the environment and society (inside out) and the associated financial opportunities and risks (outside in), companies can become active players in the field of sustainability. A careful double materiality analysis is thus a contribution to a company’s future viability, offering a solid basis for long-term success and resilience in the face of changing environmental and market conditions.

Translation is the magic word

Although a double materiality analysis is an important strategic tool, understanding the legal requirements and putting them into practice remains a major challenge. At Campana & Schott, we are dedicated to making this complex analysis tangible for our customers so companies can recognize the value it adds and tap into it for themselves.

Is your company affected by the CSRD?

If so, don’t wait – take action now and use a double materiality analysis to lay the foundations for your CSRD-compliant reporting and sustainable transformation. We’re happy to help you with this by working with you to develop the best approach for you, always with the legal requirements in mind.

Contact

Luzia Hellwig

Senior Consultant - Business Sustainablity

Additional links